← VLSI Museum

SOURCE-LINKED COMPARISON

Exynos 9610 vs Exynos 9825

GPU description: Exynos 9610 Mali-G72; Exynos 9825 Mali-G76. A sourced specification comparison.

Exynos 9610 and Exynos 9825 are compared as product models in the same soc cohort. CPU cores: Exynos 9610 lists 8; Exynos 9825 lists 8. Architecture: Exynos 9610 lists Cortex-A73; Exynos 9825 lists M4. The listed organization describes the documented configuration; it does not rank application speed.

Memory technology: Exynos 9610 lists LPDDR4X-3200; Exynos 9825 lists LPDDR4X-3600. Maximum supported memory: Exynos 9610 lists 6 GiB; Exynos 9825 lists 12 GiB. Instruction set: Exynos 9610 lists ARMv8; Exynos 9825 lists ARMv8.2. Process label: Exynos 9610 lists 10 nm; Exynos 9825 lists 7 nm. GPU description: Exynos 9610 lists Mali-G72; Exynos 9825 lists Mali-G76. The GPU and memory descriptions help identify the documented graphics and data interfaces. Process names and nominal limits require their original source context.

This comparison matches 9 sourced fields across 4 specification sections. 6 fields differ. 0 of 18 field values use manufacturer disclosures; remaining values retain their source evidence class. The field publication dates remain attached to their sources. There is no matched measured workload benchmark or current price evidence in this page, so it cannot establish a purchase winner, energy-efficiency winner or total system cost.

Documented differences

Specification / evidenceExynos 9610product-model · socExynos 9825product-model · soc
CPU coresOrganization and listed limits do not establish workload performance.8Scope: product-modelEvidence: third-party-reportSource date: 2022-06-29Source: chipswiki-327-r649 · Samsung/exynos/9610 · revision 649 · {{chip}} / core count8Scope: product-modelEvidence: third-party-reportSource date: 2020-04-26Source: chipswiki-1182-r3689 · Samsung/exynos/9825 · revision 3689 · {{chip}} / core count
CPU threadsRead the original field scope, conditions and source before comparing.8Scope: product-modelEvidence: third-party-reportSource date: 2022-06-29Source: chipswiki-327-r649 · Samsung/exynos/9610 · revision 649 · {{chip}} / thread count8Scope: product-modelEvidence: third-party-reportSource date: 2020-04-26Source: chipswiki-1182-r3689 · Samsung/exynos/9825 · revision 3689 · {{chip}} / thread count
GPU descriptionOrganization and listed limits do not establish workload performance.Mali-G72Scope: product-modelEvidence: third-party-reportSource date: 2022-06-29Source: chipswiki-327-r649 · Samsung/exynos/9610 · revision 649 · {{integrated graphics}} / gpuMali-G76Scope: product-modelEvidence: third-party-reportSource date: 2020-04-26Source: chipswiki-1182-r3689 · Samsung/exynos/9825 · revision 3689 · {{integrated graphics}} / gpu
ArchitectureRead the original field scope, conditions and source before comparing.Cortex-A73Scope: product-modelEvidence: third-party-reportSource date: 2022-06-29Source: chipswiki-327-r649 · Samsung/exynos/9610 · revision 649 · {{chip}} / microarchM4Scope: product-modelEvidence: third-party-reportSource date: 2020-04-26Source: chipswiki-1182-r3689 · Samsung/exynos/9825 · revision 3689 · {{chip}} / microarch
Instruction setRead the original field scope, conditions and source before comparing.ARMv8Scope: product-modelEvidence: third-party-reportSource date: 2022-06-29Source: chipswiki-327-r649 · Samsung/exynos/9610 · revision 649 · {{chip}} / isaARMv8.2Scope: product-modelEvidence: third-party-reportSource date: 2020-04-26Source: chipswiki-1182-r3689 · Samsung/exynos/9825 · revision 3689 · {{chip}} / isa
Process labelFoundry process names are labels, not equivalent physical dimensions.10 nmScope: product-modelEvidence: third-party-reportSource date: 2022-06-29Source: chipswiki-327-r649 · Samsung/exynos/9610 · revision 649 · {{chip}} / process7 nmScope: product-modelEvidence: third-party-reportSource date: 2020-04-26Source: chipswiki-1182-r3689 · Samsung/exynos/9825 · revision 3689 · {{chip}} / process
Maximum supported memoryRead the original field scope, conditions and source before comparing.6 GiBScope: product-modelEvidence: third-party-reportSource date: 2022-06-29Source: chipswiki-327-r649 · Samsung/exynos/9610 · revision 649 · {{memory controller}} / max mem12 GiBScope: product-modelEvidence: third-party-reportSource date: 2020-04-26Source: chipswiki-1182-r3689 · Samsung/exynos/9825 · revision 3689 · {{chip}} / max memory
Memory channelsRead the original field scope, conditions and source before comparing.4Scope: product-modelEvidence: third-party-reportSource date: 2022-06-29Source: chipswiki-327-r649 · Samsung/exynos/9610 · revision 649 · {{memory controller}} / channels4Scope: product-modelEvidence: third-party-reportSource date: 2020-04-26Source: chipswiki-1182-r3689 · Samsung/exynos/9825 · revision 3689 · {{memory controller}} / channels
Memory technologyRead the original field scope, conditions and source before comparing.LPDDR4X-3200Scope: product-modelEvidence: third-party-reportSource date: 2022-06-29Source: chipswiki-327-r649 · Samsung/exynos/9610 · revision 649 · {{memory controller}} / typeLPDDR4X-3600Scope: product-modelEvidence: third-party-reportSource date: 2020-04-26Source: chipswiki-1182-r3689 · Samsung/exynos/9825 · revision 3689 · {{memory controller}} / type

Who should consider each?

Use the soc specifications to check the intended integration requirements. For a purchase, add current availability, price, software compatibility and measurements of your workload. The field differences alone do not justify recommending one model.

Related records

Sources

  1. Exynos 9825 — ChipsWiki, revision 3689 · ChipsWiki / WikiChip contributors · 2020-04-26 · CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
  2. Exynos 9610 — ChipsWiki, revision 649 · ChipsWiki / WikiChip contributors · 2022-06-29 · CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

A specification difference is not a measured workload result. Sources and entity scope must match before drawing performance conclusions.